The Evolution of Companies Away from Corporate Innovation

Corporate innovation once stood as the pinnacle of strategic advantage for large companies. The likes of Bell Labs, Xerox PARC, and IBM were not only industry leaders but also the epicenters of technological advancements that shaped much of how we interface with technology, even today. However, in recent decades, a noticeable shift has occurred. Companies are increasingly moving away from bold, disruptive innovation and are instead focusing on incremental improvements and efficiency gains.

This article explores the reasons behind this evolution, the consequences for companies and the broader economy, and what the future may hold.

The Rise of Corporate Innovation

The mid-20th century marked the golden age of corporate innovation. Companies invested heavily in research and development, resulting in groundbreaking technologies and business models. Bell Labs, for instance, was instrumental in the development of the transistor, which laid the foundation for the entire digital age. Xerox PARC brought us the graphical user interface, while IBM revolutionized business computing with its mainframes.

During this period, innovation was not just a byproduct of competition; it was a strategic necessity. Companies recognized that staying ahead of the curve required not just participating in the market but shaping it. Government support, such as funding for R&D and policies encouraging technological advancements further fueled this innovation boom.

Shifting Priorities in Corporate Strategy

However, the landscape began to change towards the end of the 20th century. The focus shifted from innovation to efficiency, driven largely by what Clayton Christensen and Derek van Bever describe as the “Capitalist’s Dilemma.” Companies found themselves under immense pressure from shareholders to deliver short-term financial returns, often at the expense of long-term innovation​.

Financial metrics like Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) and Return on Net Assets (RONA) became the primary tools for evaluating corporate performance. These metrics favor investments that offer quick, predictable returns, typically leading to cost-cutting and efficiency improvements rather than bold, market-creating innovations. As a result, many companies started prioritizing innovations that improved existing products or streamlined operations over those that could create entirely new markets​.

The Decline of Corporate Innovation

The shift in focus from innovation to efficiency became particularly pronounced after the global financial crisis of 2008. The economic uncertainty that followed made companies even more risk-averse. Instead of investing in potentially disruptive innovations, many corporations doubled down on efficiency innovations, which promised safer, faster returns​.

This trend can be observed in several case studies. For example, Intel, once a leader in microprocessor innovation, has increasingly focused on refining its existing technologies rather than pursuing groundbreaking new ones. This strategy has allowed Intel to maintain profitability in the short term but has also opened the door for competitors like AMD and ARM to innovate and capture market share.

The Consequences of Abandoning Innovation

The move away from corporate innovation has had significant consequences. Economically, it has contributed to what some economists describe as “jobless recoveries” following recessions. In the past, economic recoveries were often driven by new industries and technologies that created jobs. However, with companies focusing more on efficiency than on creating new markets, these recoveries have become weaker and less job-intensive​.

Moreover, the decline in corporate innovation has shifted the innovation landscape. Startups and venture capital have become the new hubs of innovation and disruption, often developing technologies and business models that corporations then acquire rather than develop in-house. This trend has led to the rise of open innovation and increased corporate partnerships with startups, as large companies seek to tap into the innovation they are no longer generating internally​.

Potential Reversals and Future Directions

Despite the current focus on efficiency, there is growing recognition of the need for a renewed emphasis on innovation. Some companies are beginning to re-embrace innovation by balancing short-term financial goals with long-term strategic investments. These companies understand that while efficiency is important, it cannot come at the expense of the ability to innovate and adapt to changing markets.

Policies and education also have a role to play in this shift. Business schools, for example, are increasingly criticized for teaching finance and strategy in silos, without showing how these disciplines interact in real-world decision-making. Realigning these educational frameworks could help future business leaders better understand the importance of innovation alongside efficiency​.

Furthermore, emerging trends such as digital transformation and sustainability are creating new opportunities for innovation. Companies that can harness these trends to develop new products and services will likely find themselves at a competitive advantage in the years to come.

Conclusion

The evolution away from corporate innovation is a complex process driven by a combination of economic pressures, financial metrics, and shifting corporate strategies. While this shift has brought short-term gains, it has also led to longer-term challenges, including slower economic growth and reduced job creation. However, by re-emphasizing innovation, both through corporate strategies and supportive policies, companies can find a balance that allows them to thrive in both the short and long term.

3 Must Reads

Enjoying Innovate, Disrupt, or Die?

Refer 3 friends and we’ll send you a copy of our exclusive e-book, Beyond Buzzwords: Driving Tangible and Repeatable Innovation in Business.

Share this link to refer a friend:
https://www.innovatedisruptordie.com/subscribe?ref=PLACEHOLDER