An Industry in Crisis

The rise of digital photography in the late 1990s marked a turning point for the film industry. As demand for traditional film plummeted, companies like Kodak and Fujifilm faced an existential threat.

Kodak initially seemed better positioned—it invented the first digital camera in 1975 and held numerous patents that could have cemented its role as a leader in the new era. However, Kodak’s reluctance to disrupt its lucrative film business, which accounted for the bulk of its profits, led to missed opportunities.

Kodak’s fixation on preserving its film revenue prevented it from fully embracing digital. Despite significant investments in digital technology during the 2000s, the company struggled to transition its business model. In fact, in 2006, Kodak CEO Antonio Perez was quoted as stating outright that “digital cameras are a crappy business.”

And he wasn’t wrong. As a former VP at Kodak explained, “A good engineer could buy all the building blocks and put together a camera… Suppliers selling components offered the technology to anyone who would pay, and there were few entry barriers.”

Gone were the advantages of Kodak and Fujifilm’s near-duopoly in the film space, enabled by early breakthroughs in color film and development. By 2012, Kodak filed for bankruptcy, becoming a cautionary tale of how even the most iconic brands can falter. 

Fujifilm’s Differentiated Approach

Kodak and Fujifilm were on nearly equal footing at the onset of this era of disruption in the film space. So, how did Fujifilm thrive just as Kodak entered its death throes?

Disruptive Innovation.

Fujifilm adopted a bold and proactive strategy. Under CEO Shigetaka Komori, the company embraced the digital revolution and diversified its business portfolio. Fujifilm strategically leveraged its expertise in chemical engineering to move beyond imaging, expanding into areas such as healthcare, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals.

Antioxidant Research

To prevent color fading in photographs, Fujifilm had developed technologies to combat oxidation caused by ultraviolet rays. It turns out that their technologies developed to prevent the oxidation of chemicals in photo film could also be applied to skincare. Their research led to the incorporation of astaxanthin, a potent natural antioxidant, into a new line of skincare products. Astaxanthin helps protect the skin from UV-induced aging, similar to how it preserves photographic quality.

Collagen Expertise

Collagen, a primary component in both photographic film and human skin, has been extensively studied by Fujifilm. Their deep understanding of collagen’s properties enabled them to select and utilize the most effective types for enhancing skin moisture and elasticity in their cosmetics lines.

Light Analysis and Control

Fujifilm’s proficiency in light analysis and control, essential for accurate color reproduction in photography, was adapted to develop cosmetics that enhance skin appearance under various lighting conditions. This technology ensures that their makeup products provide a consistent and flattering look regardless of the light source.

A Case Study in Disruptive Innovation

By leveraging these core technologies from its photographic business, Fujifilm successfully diversified into the cosmetics sector, demonstrating adaptability and innovative application of existing expertise. This shift represents a classic case study in disruptive innovation, and a key example of the power of innovation to shift the trajectory of a global business.

A key difference between the Kodak and Fujifilm lay in their organizational cultures and leadership approaches. While Kodak’s rigid hierarchy and risk aversion slowed its ability to adapt, Fujifilm fostered a culture of agility and innovation through Kaizen, or “continuous improvement.”

This philosophy enabled Fujifilm to:

Optimize Legacy Businesses: Fujifilm used profits from its legacy film business to fund R&D for emerging markets.

Embrace Iterative Change: Kaizen encouraged rapid experimentation and learning, helping Fujifilm pivot effectively.

Promote Flexibility: Fujifilm’s leadership empowered teams to act decisively, fostering adaptability across the organization.

Strategic Lessons for Today’s Businesses

The diverging paths of Kodak and Fujifilm offer critical lessons for corporations that are navigating disruption (or looking to cause it):

Embrace Change: Companies must be willing to disrupt their core business to adapt to changing markets.

Leverage Core Competencies: Fujifilm’s diversification shows the importance of applying existing expertise to new industries.

Foster Agility: Cultural adaptability, such as Fujifilm’s Kaizen-driven approach, is crucial for staying ahead of change.

Invest Decisively: Recognizing a shift is not enough—decisive execution is required to capitalize on emerging opportunities

GoPro and the Commoditization of Digital Imaging

GoPro’s meteoric rise in the early 2000s exemplifies how the commoditization of digital components enabled new entrants to disrupt traditional imaging markets. Founded in 2002 by Nick Woodman, GoPro leveraged falling costs and increasing availability of digital imaging technologies such as sensors, memory, and microprocessors. By sourcing components that had become widely accessible due to advancements in digital technology, GoPro created affordable, high-quality action cameras tailored for extreme sports enthusiasts. This strategy allowed the company to dominate the niche market and become synonymous with adventure videography.

The commoditization of digital components not only enabled GoPro’s rise but also set the stage for challenges as competitors entered the market. By the late 2010s, the same forces that had allowed GoPro to innovate became a double-edged sword. The widespread availability of the same components GoPro relied on meant that low-cost competitors could replicate their technology at reduced prices.

Additionally, advancements in smartphone cameras, which offered increasingly sophisticated video capabilities, further reduced the need for dedicated action cameras. These pressures led to declining sales and profit margins for GoPro, even as the brand retained strong consumer recognition.

GoPro sought to sustain its competitive edge by introducing new products and features, such as the Karma drone and software platforms for editing and sharing content. However, the failure of the Karma drone, coupled with persistent commoditization pressures, demonstrated that even innovative efforts can fall short without a clear path to differentiation. GoPro’s struggles highlight a broader challenge in the digital imaging market: as components become cheaper and more accessible, companies must not only innovate but also ensure that their innovations create meaningful and lasting value for consumers.

Enjoying Innovate, Disrupt, or Die?

Refer 3 friends and we’ll send you a copy of our exclusive e-book, Beyond Buzzwords: Driving Tangible and Repeatable Innovation in Business.

All you have to do is share your link:
https://www.innovatedisruptordie.com/subscribe?ref=PLACEHOLDER